 | James Parker Hall, James De Witt Andrews - 1910 - 484 sider
...its limitations are stated in the NI L. as follows: Sec. 58. ... But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect to all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | 1910 - 1336 sider
...negotiable instrument law (page 709, i 1676 — 28), which provides: "A holder who dérivée his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud, duress or Illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1910 - 784 sider
...Instrument Law (sec. 1676 — 28, Stats.: Supp. 1906), which provides : "A holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud, duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
 | Wyndham Anstis Bewes - 1910 - 316 sider
...gambling in securities is considered in law to be given without consideration (or value) ; but " a holder (whether for value or not) who derives his title to a bill (y) Marten v. Gibbon (1876), 33 LT 561, CA (e) Laughton v. Griffin, [1895] AC 104. (a) Thwaites v.... | |
 | International Law Association. Conference - 1910 - 822 sider
...Inhabers for value (holder in due course), wenn er seinen Titel von einem solchen Inhaber ableitet. (If he derives his title to a bill through a holder in due course) BEA section 29(3) und NIL section 97.) Die geringfügigen Ausnahmen von diesen R» geln z. B. bei Fälschung... | |
 | Joseph Doddridge Brannan - 1911 - 372 sider
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable.45 But a holder40 who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1911 - 1078 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter."... | |
 | Samuel Williston - 1911 - 326 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defences as if it were non-negotiable, but a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality on the instrument has all the rights of such former holder, in respect to all parties prior to the... | |
 | Samuel Williston - 1911 - 322 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defences as if it were non-negotiable, but a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality on the instrument has all the rights of such former holder, in respect to all parties prior to the... | |
| |
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any... 
