 And although the arguing from Experiments and Observations by Induction be no Demonstration of general Conclusions; yet it is the best way of arguing which the Nature of Things admits of, and may be looked upon as so much the stronger, by how much the...  Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind - Side 348av Dugald Stewart - 1814Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Stanley Joel Reiser, Michael Anbar - 1984 - 386 sider
...in experimental philosophy. And although the arguing from experiments and observations by induction be no demonstration of general conclusions, yet it...of arguing which the nature of things admits of.... By this way of analysis we may proceed from compounds to ingredients, and from motions to the forces... | |
 | Margaret J. Osler, Paul Lawrence Farber - 2002 - 372 sider
...reservation is expressed in the Opticks: Although the arguing from experiments and observations by induction be no demonstration of general conclusions, yet it...the nature of things admits of, and may be looked on as so much the stronger, by how much the induction is more general. And if no exception occur from... | |
 | Michael R. Matthews - 1989 - 180 sider
...in experimental Philosophy. And although the arguing from Experiments and Observations by Induction be no Demonstration of general Conclusions; yet it...Induction is more general. And if no Exception occur from Phaenomena, the Conclusion may be pronounced generally. But if at any time afterwards any Exception... | |
 | William Whewell - 1989 - 386 sider
...experiments or other certain truths. And although the arguing from experiments and observations by induction be no demonstration of general conclusions; yet it...stronger, by how much the induction is more general." And he then observes, as we have quoted above, that by this way of analysis we proceed from compounds to... | |
 | Frederick Suppe - 1989 - 508 sider
...his Optiks (1704) writes that "although the arguing from Experiments and Observations by Induction be no Demonstration of General Conclusions, yet it...best way of arguing which the Nature of Things admits of."8 But, as the historical controversy over Hypotheses nonfingo in The General Scholium of the second... | |
 | Peter Achinstein - 1991 - 346 sider
...results of experiments and observations one proceeds to draw general conclusions by induction; and "... it is the best way of arguing which the Nature of Things admits of." However, Newton also speaks of the method of composition or synthesis. His idea seems to be that once... | |
 | Robert Markley - 1993 - 292 sider
...in experimental Philosophy. And although the arguing from Experiments and Observations by Induction be no Demonstration of general Conclusions; yet it...Induction is more general. And if no Exception occur from Phaenomena, the Conclusion may be pronounced generally. But if at any time afterwards any Exception... | |
 | S. Kleiner - 1993 - 364 sider
...in experimental philosophy. And although the arguing from experiments and observations by induction be no demonstration of general conclusions, yet it...nature of things admits of, and may be looked upon as much the stronger by how much the induction is more general. And if no exception occur from phenomena,... | |
 | Thomas Levenson - 1995 - 358 sider
...other certain Truths. . . . And although the arguing from Experiments and Observations by Induction be no Demonstration of general Conclusions; yet it...way of arguing which the Nature of Things admits of. ... By this way of Analysis we may proceed from Compounds to Ingredients, and from Motions to the Forces... | |
 | Richard Henry Popkin, G.M. Weiner - 1994 - 234 sider
..."Principles" inductively derived from them are only "morally certain" and that such "Principles" are initially "the best way of arguing which the Nature of Things admits of." It is also the case, for Newton, that a single, well-chosen experimentum crucis may be the basis for... | |
| |
