 That in actions by or against executors, administrators or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate...  The Southwestern Reporter - Side 1891917Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1889 - 680 sider
...neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transactions with or statements of the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party." * * * James P. Brown, for appellant. The personal knowledge of appellant, that on the night of the... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1888 - 634 sider
...judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate, or ward, with certain qualifications not here material. The testimony offered is as to a transaction between... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1914 - 652 sider
...shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transactions with or statements of the testate, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party." Section 2 of Schedule to Constitution of 1874. The question is decided adversely to defendant's contention... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1889 - 246 sider
...judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testily against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator,...unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the Court." USRS, § 858. ' This provision (USBS, § 858), wherever... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 860 sider
...al? lowed to testify ag.iinst the other, as to any * transaction with, or statement by, the*testator, intestate, or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the court. In all other respects, the laws of the state in which... | |
 | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1890 - 678 sider
...judgment may be rendered against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with or statement by the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testily thereto by the opposite party or required to testify by the court." Does the testimony of Andrews... | |
 | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1891 - 652 sider
...judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with or statement by the testator,...unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party or required to testify thereto by the court. Consequently, on the face of the record and evidence as... | |
 | Frank Sumner Rice - 1892 - 832 sider
...judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with, or statement by the testator,...unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party or required to testify thereto by the court. In all other respects the laws of the State in which the... | |
 | 1903 - 880 sider
...may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the •other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator,...unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required totestify thereto by the court. In all other respects the laws of the state In which the... | |
 | 1902 - 832 sider
...executors, administrators, or guardians neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with or statement by the testator. Intestate, or ward, etc., has no application to territorial courts. 2. SAME— LAWS OP OKEGON— APPLICABILITY TO ALASKA.... | |
| |
