 | George Roberts Perkins - 1841 - 274 sider
...the word OF, which connects thefractiondl parts, as equivalent to the sign of multiplication. Then multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator;...all the denominators together for a new denominator. Always observing to reject, or cancel, such factors as are common to the numerators and denominators... | |
 | Thomas Sherwin - 1841 - 314 sider
...h*e manner. o aba baud b ' d ' nbdn Hence we deduce the RULE FOR MULTIPLYING FRACTIONS BY FRACTIONS. Multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator,...all the denominators together for a new denominator. Remark. As the results should be reduced to the lowest terms, it is convenient to represent the operation... | |
 | Roswell Chamberlain Smith - 1841 - 324 sider
...fractions reduce them to such first, then multiply each numerator by all the denominators except its own, for a new numerator; and all the denominators together for a new denominator. 6. Reduce f , f , and 4 to a com. denominator. A -St- • '-" j - 13_ **•• 12TT». TITS'- T2f2x6x7=... | |
 | John M'Nevin - 1841 - 300 sider
...whence the following Rule is deduced: multiply each numerator by all the denominators, except its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators together for a new denominator. Exampk.—Add 62^ « 37| « 19f By Reduction £ is equal to 50 cents. J " 25 « Ans. l|f = $1.81t Add... | |
 | John M'Nevin - 1841 - 300 sider
...whence the following Rule is deduced: multiply each numerator by all the denominators, except its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators together for a new denominator. Example.— Add 62£ " 37| Add 4, i, f, and TV together, (say dollars.) By Reduction $ is equal to... | |
 | Benjamin Greenleaf - 1842 - 184 sider
...the following Change mixed numbers and whole numbers, if there be any, to improper fractions ; then multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator,...all the denominators together for a new denominator ; the fraction should tlien be reduced to its lowest terms. 6. What is § of | of f ? OPKRATIOK. 7.... | |
 | Roswell Chamberlain Smith - 1842 - 320 sider
...fractions reduce them to fuch first, then multiply each numerator by all the denominators except its own, for a new numerator ; and all the denominators together for a new denominator. 6. Reduce f , f , and 4 to a com. denominator. 105. 2x6x7= 84. 5x3x7 = 105. Then£=iff. 4x6x3= 72.... | |
 | Wales Christopher Hotson - 1842 - 306 sider
...transformation will be effected if each numerator be multiplied by all the denominators, except its own, for a new numerator, and all the denominators together for a new denominator. Ex. To transform - - , — ; — , and , , , so as to a-1 a+1 a2+l have a common denominator. Multiplying... | |
 | Nathan Daboll - 1843 - 254 sider
...three equal parts, it will take 12 such parts to make a whole one ; therefore ^ of j is -jlj, Answer. RULE. Multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator, and all the denominators for a new denominator, and they will form the fraction required, which reduce to its lowest terms.... | |
 | mrs. Henry Ayres - 1843 - 470 sider
...MULTIPLICATION. Rule. — Prepare all those fractions that require it by the rules for Reduction, then multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator, and all the denominators for a new denominator. The work may be considerably shortened by striking out numbers alike in the... | |
| |
Multiply all the numerators together for a new numerator, and all the denominators together for a new denominator. 
