 | 1863 - 832 sider
...not extend to a tax imposed on the interest which cttizens of Maryland may hold in this institution in common with other property of the same description throughout the State. This point was wholly foreign to the case before the Court, jlf it be good law, the purchase of stork... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1863 - 76 sider
...State, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the State. But this is a tax on the operations of the bank, and is, consequently, a tax on the operations of an... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1866 - 724 sider
...nor to a tax imposed upon the interests which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the State." This language, erroneously cited sometimes as warranting the doctrine that government securities owned... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 726 sider
...9 Wallace, 589. f Ib. 590. J Ib. 691. Reply — Against the tax. land may hold in this institution in common with other property of the same description throughout the State." The tax of the State of Nebraska is not laid upon the shares of the Union Pacific Railroad Company... | |
 | James Kent - 1866 - 724 sider
...nor to a tax imposed upon the interest which the citizens of Maryland might hold in that institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the state, (a) The decision pronounced in this case against the validity of the Maryland tax was made on the 7th... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 930 sider
...state, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the state." Under this exception it was supposed that shareholders in the United States Bank were liable to taxation... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Joel Tiffany - 1868 - 1050 sider
...State, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the State. But tins is a tax on the operations of the bank, and is consequently a tax on the operations of an... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - 1869 - 622 sider
...State, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution in common with other property of the same description throughout the State. But this is a tax on the operations of the bank, and is consequently a tax on the operation of an instrument... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1872 - 192 sider
...imposed on the proprietary interest which the citizens of that State may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the State.— McCuLLOH vs. THE STATE or MARYLAND ET AL., 4 Wheaton's Reports, page 316. XXVIII. ^jparfeMiLLiGAN.... | |
 | 1916 - 502 sider
...state, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the state." It will be noticed that it is not here asserted that the state might properly impose such a tax. At... | |
| |
... deprive the States of any resources which they originally possessed. It does not extend to a tax paid by the real property of the bank, in common with the other real property within the State, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens... 
