 Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property for public use without just compensation,...  Railway Problems - Side 540redigert av - 1907 - 686 siderUten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1908 - 540 sider
...state of the charges of railroad companies) is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy ; and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense (oil CB & Q. R Co. v. Cutts, supra. (52) Smyth v. Ames. 169 US 466; Lake Shore etc. R. Co. v. Smith.... | |
 | United States. Federal Trade Commission - 1935 - 1440 sider
...said (p. 331): This power to regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not tbeequivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares...neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking Л private property for public use without just compensation, or without dieprocess of law. A few years... | |
 | Emory Richard Johnson, Grover Gerhardt Huebner, George Lloyd Wilson - 1928 - 848 sider
...regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot...reward ; neither can it do that which in law amounts to taking of private property for public use without just compensation, or without due process of law."... | |
 | Charles Evans Hughes - 1928 - 292 sider
...regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot...corporation to carry persons or property without reward ; nor can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property without just compensation,... | |
 | Taylor Ellis Groninger - 1928 - 416 sider
...confirming the right of a state to make rates through a commission, said : "This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating rates and freights, the state can not require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | Benjamin Franklin Shambaugh - 1912 - 180 sider
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State can not require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1931 - 1216 sider
...that thIs power of limitation or regulation Is Itself without limit. This power to regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the equivalent...carry persons or property without reward; neither oan It do that which In law amounts to a taking of private property for public use without just compensation,... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1896 - 728 sider
...concession in an opinion, still against the companies, was thrown out that " the power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freight, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward,... | |
 | 1916 - 698 sider
...destroy, and limitation is not equivalent to confiscation under pretense of regulating fares and rates. The State cannot require a railroad corporation to...reward. Neither can it do that which in law amounts to taking of private property, either to be used without just compensation or without due process of law."... | |
 | Bar Association of Arkansas - 1908 - 650 sider
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy; and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights the State cannot require a railroad company to carry persons... | |
| |
