...The third thing I would note is that act — section 13 of the act — simply says, "Nothing in this act shall be construed so as to interfere with or...impede or diminish in any way the right to strike." I can assure you, sir, that the prospect of replacement workers does impede the right to strike and...

...13. Nothing in this Act, except as specifically provided for herein, shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike, or to affect the limitations or qualifications on that right. Further amend said amendment by adding...

...Act, including the "right to refrain" relied upon by the Court today, "shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike, or to affect the limitations or qualifications on that right.". . . The strike or the threat to strike...

...DISPUTES. AND FURTHER, THAT THE USE OF THE STRIKE WAS TO BE A PART OF THAT DYNAMIC. SECTION 13 OF THE NLRA PROVIDES, "NOTHING IN THIS ACT SHALL BE CONSTRUED...IMPEDE OR DIMINISH IN ANY WAY THE RIGHT TO STRIKE". THE NLRA HOLDS OUT A PROMISE OF THE WORKERS RIGHT TO STRIKE. FOR THE WORKERS OF JAY, IT HAS PROVED...

...bargaining of other mutual aid or protection"; and section 13, which promises that "nothing in this Act" shall be construed so as to "interfere with or...impede or diminish in any way the right to strike." In any meaningful sense, hiring persons off the street to permanently replace those who go on strike...

...employees and said they did not lose their status as employees, and went on to say that nothing in this act shall be construed so as to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike. I submit to you the Mackay doctrine, Senator, does exactly that. The notion that somehow you can recognize...

...employees and said they did not lose their status as employees, and went on to say that nothing in this act shall be construed so as to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike. I submit to you the Mackay doctrine, Senator, does exactly that. The notion that somehow you can recognize...

...USC §152(3). And §13 declares 6 that "[n]othing in [the NLRA] . . . shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike ....'" 29 USc §163. Given these provisions it -has been understood from the first that an employee...

...decision in HLRB v. Mackay Radio S Telegraph Company,1 held that, Although Section 13 [of the NLRA] provides, 'Nothing in this Act shall be construed...impede or diminish in any way the right to strike,* 1t does not follow that an employer, guilty of no act denounced by the statute, has lost the right...

...29 VSC 5152(3). And $13 declares that "[n]othing in [the NLRA] . . . shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike . . . . " 29 USC §163. Given these provisions it has been understood from the first that the right...