...a question of the proximateness of consequences, and said that the point to be ascertained was : " Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Or was there some new and independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" The court...

...the facts that may be presented In any particular case, and that is, where the evidence discloses a succession of events so linked together as to make a natural whole and all so connected with the first event as to be in legal contemplation the natural result thereof,...

...moved by a force applied to the other end; that force being the proximate cause of the movement. » * * The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful net and the injury — a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of...

...squib thrown in the market place. Scott v. Shepherd (Squib Case) 2 W. Bl. 802. The question alwnys is. Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? Tt is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

...Kd. Co., supra, quoting from Milwaukee & St. Paul Ky. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 4C9, 24 L. Ed. 256, said: "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

..." The question always is," said Mr. Justice STBOUO in Milwaukee, etc. RR Co. v. Kelloyy, 04 US 415, "was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation ? DiJ the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural...

...the movement, or as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. 2 Bl. Rep. 892Г The question always is : Was there an unbroken connection...cause Intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

...the proximate cause of the movement, or, as In the oft-cited case of the squib In the' market place. The question always Is, Was there an unbroken connection...natural whole, or was there some new and Independent Intervening cause between the wrong and Injury?" All the cases cited by appellee (SA & AP Ry. Co. v....

...Shepherd (Squib Case) 2 W. B1. 892. The question always is, Was there an unbroken connection? Would the facts constitute a continuous succession of events...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? * * * In the nature of things there is in pvery transaction a succession of events, more or less dependent...

..."proximate cause" is found in Milwaukee & St. Paul R. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 24 L. Ed. 250, as follows: "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Did tue facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole,...