...any legal defense: Prentlss v. Brewer, 17 Wls. 635, 86 Am. Dec. 730; and the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of bis adversary's: Illinois Steel Co. v. Bllot, 109 Wls. 418, 83 Am. St. Rep. 905, 84 NW 855, 85 NW 402;...

...It is of course primary doctrine that in a possessory action of this nature, the plaintiff must rely on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of the defendants, and so he must show here that he has a valid title as against the defendants, and, to show that fact, it...

...valid as against the one it is not as against the other. The location is his title, and he must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. Gwillim ». Donnellan, (1885) 115 US 45. A recovery cannot he maintained by proof of...

...to actions of fro ver justifies this course: for in trover, as in ejectment, the plaintiff recovers on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of his antagonist's title. Possession is good against all the world except the true owner (see Asher v....

...reason, in favor of defendant. It is a wellsettled general rule of law that the plaintiff in ejectment must succeed on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of the defendant's title Where legal title is established by neither parly in an action of ejectment,...

...Daniel, 90 Va, 704, 19 SE 881, and Bradley v. Ewart, 18 W. Va. 606, holding plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of the defendant's. « Wheat 583-592, 5 L. 836, OTIS v. WALTER. Under embargo act of 1808, if a vessel...

...matter that the former judgment did not establish such grantor's title, as plaintiff must recover ou the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary.— Walker v. Hill, 111 Ind. 223, 12 NE 387. [g] (Sap. 1889) Land was devised subject...

...for a patent, with the exception of advertisement and surveyor general's certificate. He must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of liis adversary's. Providence Gold Min. Co. r. Burke, 6 Ariz. 323, 57 Рис. 641 (1S90). An action...

...lost or abandoned his prior right. Belk v. Meagher, supra. In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. The question to be settled by judicial determination, so far as he is concerned, is...

...application to the present case. Tliis is a petitory action In which the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary, where, therefore, the defendant is not required to show any title at all, but may say...