 | Angie Debo - 1970 - 468 sider
...Worcester v. Georgia decision in February, 1832, the Cherokees won a complete victory. Said the court: "The Cherokee Nation, then, is a distinct community,...own territory, with boundaries accurately described, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1986 - 1316 sider
...Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 515, 560 (1832), Chief Justice Marshall wrote that an Indian reservation "is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which [state laws] can have no force . . . ." Despite this early statement emphasizing the importance of... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs - 1989 - 780 sider
...."'° All intercourse with the Indians was to be carried on exclusively by the government of the Union. The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community,...territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which ihc cili/cns of Georgia have no right 10 cnicr. but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves. .... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1990 - 524 sider
...v. Georgia, 31 0.8. (6 Pet.) 515, 561 (1832), Chief Justice Marshall wrote that the Cherokee Nation "is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which . . . [state laws] can have no force. . . but. . . in conformity with treaties, and acts of Congress.*... | |
 | Lawrence H. Fuchs - 1990 - 652 sider
...Court, did assume jurisdiction, and in Worcester v. Georgia (1832) established that the Cherokee nation "is a distinct community occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves,... | |
 | Paul A. Varg - 1992 - 270 sider
...another notable case, Worcester vs Georgia, Marshall appeared to give cause for cheer. Marshall held: The Cherokee Nation, then, is a distinct community,...own territory, with boundaries accurately described, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, but with the assent of the Cherokees themselvse,... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1992 - 518 sider
...independent, political communities, retaining their original natural rights from time immemorial ...."), 561 ("The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory ... in which the laws of Georgia can have no force .... "). [Cherokee] nation to govern itself"68 and... | |
 | Dan McGovern - 1995 - 362 sider
...insofar as the individual states were concerned, unless the federal government provided to the contrary. "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territory ... in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs (1993- ) - 1995 - 572 sider
...Eg. Worcester V.Georgia. 31 US (6 Pet.) 515, 559 (1832)." H For example, the Chief Justice stated: "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory *** in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs (1993- ) - 1995 - 580 sider
...EjS-, Worcester v.Georgia. 31 US (6 Pet.) 515, 559 (1832)." ** For example, the Chief Justice stated: "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory *** in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right... | |
| |
The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, but with the assent of the... 
