... that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party... The Supreme Court Reporter - Side 4401885Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| 1889 - 1240 sider
...Afunson, 14 Wall. 448, said: "Recent decisions of high authority have established a more reasonable rule, that in every case, before the evidence is left to...there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to iind a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed." On this same point... | |
| Austin Abbott - 1889 - 246 sider
...Ired. (NC) L., 545 (question whether there was a writing such as to preclude oral evidence.) The rule, that in every case, before the evidence is left to...judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but wliether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing... | |
| Seymour Dwight Thompson - 1889 - 1428 sider
...the evidence is left to the jury, there is, ormay be ineyerv case, a preliminary niu^tior) fojrjhe judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can property proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed."... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 736 sider
...leave it to the jury, but recent decisions of high authority have established a more reasonable rule, that in every case, before the evidence is left to...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed.}; Very strong doubts are entertained whether the construction, of the language employed by the judge,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 1182 sider
...in refusing to charge the jury that the plaintiff, upon the evidence, was not entitled to recover. In every case before the evidence is left to the jury...jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the parties producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed. Pleasant» v. Fant, 89 US 22 Wall. 120,... | |
| District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1891 - 652 sider
...leave it to the jury; but recent decisions of high authority have established a more reasonable rule, that in every case, before the evidence is left to...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed." Improvement Co. vs. Mason, 14 Wall., 448. In a later case, the Supreme Court states the rule as follows... | |
| |