 Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired...  The New York Supplement - Side 7721918Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1912 - 440 sider
...holder is deemed, prima facie, to be a holder in due course." The same section further provides that "when it is shown that the title of any person who...person under whom he claims, acquired the title as holder in due course." The affidavit of defense is brief, but, to the point. Defendant avers that he... | |
 | Maryland - 1898 - 700 sider
...holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. 78. Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the...negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden ia on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims, acquired the title as a holder... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1921 - 1108 sider
...section 98 of the Negotiable Instruments Law as follows: " Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." It is provided in section 94 of the same law: " The title of a person who negotiates an instrument... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1912 - 832 sider
...in the pase of Davis v. Rartlett, supra, I will read it. "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...who has negotiated the instrument was defective," and we have already had the definition that if a note is obtained by fraud the title is defective,... | |
 | Colorado - 1897 - 394 sider
...in respect of all parties prior to the latter. Sec. 59. Every holder is deemed priina facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior... | |
 | New York (State) - 1897 - 996 sider
...the latter. § 98. Who deemed holder in due course. — Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior... | |
 | Iowa. General Assembly. House of Representatives - 1897 - 1164 sider
...in respect of all parties prior to the latter. Sec. 66. Every holder is deemed i<rlma facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior... | |
 | Joseph Fitz Randolph - 1899 - 1068 sider
...latter. riec. 98 (59). Who Deemed Holder in Due Course. Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. J5ut the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument... | |
 | Wisconsin - 1899 - 856 sider
...Wis., 679. Eastman v. Porter, 14 Wls., 39. SECTION 1676-29. Every holder is deemi-d prima fade to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior... | |
| |
