 power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward ; neither can it do that which in law...  Railway Problems - Side 584redigert av - 1907 - 686 siderUten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892
...power to destroy, or a power to compel the doing of the services without reward, or to take private property for public use without just compensation or without due process of law, the court said that it had no means, " if it would under any circumstances have the power," of determining... | |
 | California Public Utilities Commission - 1894
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...just compensation or without due process of law.' "This language was quoted in the subsequent case of Dow vs. Beidelman, 125 US 680, 689 (31: 841, 843),... | |
 | Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of California - 1894
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...just compensation or without due process of law.' "This language was quoted in the subsequent case of Dow vs. Beidelman, 125 US 680, 689 (31: 841, 843),... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1894
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota - 1895
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - 1895 - 2434 sider
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of California - 1896
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...carry persons or property without reward, neither can they do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property for public use without just compensation... | |
 | 1896
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | 1896
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1898 - 423 sider
...pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons and property without reward ; neither can it do that which...just compensation or without due process of law." 2 Although it is not the province of the courts to enter upon the administrative task of framing a... | |
| |
