Søk Bilder Maps Play YouTube Nyheter Gmail Disk Mer »
Logg på
Bøker Bok 131140 av 169In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be...
" In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the... "
Atlantic Reporter - Side 72
1904
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

American law reports annotated, Volum 12

1921
...into by a runaway horse and wagon, the court applied the rule that, "to constitute proximate cause, the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and be of such a character as an ordinarily prudent person ought to have foreseen might probably occur...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

Cases on the Law of Damages

Ralph Stanley Bauer - 1923 - 763 sider
...Hudson River RR Co., 209 Pa. 128, 131, 58 Atl. 160, 161, it was said: ' ' The rule is well settled that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act without probable foresight, and if the facts as to the cause of the injury are not disputed,...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

Complete Digest of All Lawyers Reports Annotated from 1 L.R.A. to L ..., Volum 7

1922
...(NS) 819, 220 111. 300. 82 NE 302. a2. In determining what is the proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act. Anderson v. Baltimore & 0. R. Co. 51 LRA (NS) 888, 74 W. Va. 17, 81 SE 579. b. The natural...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

The Federal Reporter: With Key-number Annotations ..., Volum 278

1922
...580), the court used the following language : "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." It was laid down by Lord Ellenborough in 1807 in Vicars v. Wilcocks, 8 East, 1, that a man is answerable...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

The Federal Reporter

1905
...circumstances." In Hoag v. Railroad Co., 85 Pa. 293, 27 Am. Rep. 653, it is said : "The true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from the act." In the light of these and other authorities, and the undisputed evidence in these cases,...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

The Central Law Journal, Volum 34

1892
...236 THE CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL. 237 follows: uln determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from bis act. Railway Co. v. Taylor, 104 Pa. St. 306; Township...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

The Central Law Journal, Volum 9

1879
...defendants' locomotive. The rule THE CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL. for determining what its prox'mate cause is, that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the act in the first instance, and that it might and ought to have been foreseen under the circumstances....
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

The Central Law Journal, Volum 80

1915
...Cement Corporation, Iowa, 148 NW 982. 93.— — Proximate Cause. — To constitute proxlihate cause, the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and be such as an ordinarily prudent person ought to have foreseen, might probably occur as a result...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

Atlantic Reporter, Volum 49

1901
...such an act that the injury is the natural and probable sequence of negligence, — such a sequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case,...foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. Unless the Injury Is produced In that way. it Is quite unimportant to consider how negligent the defendant...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken

Atlantic Reporter, Volum 100

1917
...Cent. & Hudson River RR Co., 209 Pa. 128, 131, 58 Atl. 160, 161, it was said: "The rule is well settled that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act without probable foresight, and if the facts as to the cause of the injury are not disputed,...
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken




  1. Mitt bibliotek
  2. Hjelp
  3. Avansert boksøk
  4. Last ned PDF