In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the... Atlantic Reporter - Side 721904Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| 1920 - 1206 sider
...Рас. 973, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 355 and note. [4] In determining what Is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the act — such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to... | |
| Thomas Gaskell Shearman, Amasa Angell Redfield - 1888 - 720 sider
...Sharp v. Powell, LR 7 CP 253; Thompson, 1083. "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...the •wrong-doer, as likely to flow from his act" (per Paxson, J., Pittsburgh So. R. Co. v. Taylor, 104 Penn. St. 306 ; SP Hoag v. Lake Shore, &c. R.... | |
| 1914 - 1282 sider
...car. "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule Is that the Injury must be the natural aud probable consequence of the negligence ; such a consequence...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." Mitchell v. Rochester Ry. Co., 151 NY 107, 45... | |
| Frederick Sackett, Martin L. Newell - 1888 - 836 sider
...to be deemed the proximate cause of an injury, nn'ess the injury was snch a consequence of the act as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen or anticipated by an ordinarily reasonable and prudent man, as reasonably likely to flow from the act.... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1911 - 700 sider
...68: "In determining whether an act of a defendant is the proximate cause of an injury, the rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the act — such a consequence, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, as might and ought to... | |
| New York (State). Marine Court (New York), Daniel T. Robertson, Edward Jacobs - 1889 - 484 sider
...tho rule as to proximate cause as follows : " In determining what is proximate cause the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wroug-doer, as likely to now from his act. " Applying this rule to th.- facts of the present case,... | |
| John Forrest Dillon - 1890 - 894 sider
...574. 2 Thomps. Neg. 766. The rule as to proximate anil remote causes stated by Paxson, J., to be " that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have benn foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act." Hoag ». Lake Shore & MSRR Co., 85... | |
| Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1891 - 858 sider
...Varnau were the natural and probable consequence of the negligence of the defendant, or its servants, such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and should have been foreseen by the servant as likely to flow from his carelessness, and there was no... | |
| |