...instruction the plaintiff excepted. The Court further charged the jury: "To render the defendant liable, the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...of the negligence, such a consequence as, under the circumstances, might or ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to result from his...

...present chief justice in Hoag v. Lake Shore etc. RR Co., 85 Pa. St. 293, 27 Am. Rep. 653, as follows: " The injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as .... might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act" The three...

...could not have been foreseen by the engineer as the natural and probable consequence of his conduct. The injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence — such a consequence as might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act. Pennsylvania...

...somewhere. There is a possibility of carrying an admittedly correct principle too far ... The true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the [defendant's] negligence — such a consequence, as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case,...

...cause. The rule on this subject is as follows: "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." Pittsburgh Southern R. Co. r. Taylor, 104 Fa....

...The rule on this subject is as follows : "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the ftegligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances of the case might and ought...

...The rule on this subject is as follows: "In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is, that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong-doer as an. 1892.] EvviNG г?. PITTSBURGH ETC. E'y Co. 71f ikely to flow from his...

...48. consequence of the defendant's acts (Ryan v. RR Co., 35 NY 210; RR Co. v. Reeves, 10 Wall. 176) ; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances...foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. The court in Jex v. Straus, 122 NY 301 said : ' The law requires that the injury must proceed so directly...

...The rule on this subject is as follows: " In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is, that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence...consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the d, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act": Pittsburgh...

...caused by the cars frightening a horse.1 The injury must be the natural and probable consequence of negligence, such a consequence as, under the surrounding...and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer is likely to flow from his act. Thus, where a person knew that there were overturned cars near a public...