 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1911 - 1008 sider
...trial court abused its discretion in granting the order for a new trial. "The granting or denying a new trial on the ground that the evidence is insufficient...verdict, where there is a substantial conflict in the evidence," says the supreme court, in Domico v. Casassa, 101 Cal. 413, [35 Pac. 1024], "rests so fully... | |
 | 1906 - 2184 sider
...Insufficient to justify the verdict. BzvEKaiNO OROSK GIU.NTIM; NEW TBIAL.— If the Court below grants a new trial on the ground that the evidence Is Insufficient to Justify the verdict, the Appellate Court will not reverse the order, ezcept In case of an evident abuse of discretion. APPEAL... | |
 | Robert Y. Hayne - 1912 - 1036 sider
...court cannot interfere with the verdict of a jury, nor with the action of the court below in refusing a new trial, on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict, unless there was such a lack of evidence as to satisfy us that the court below abused its discretion... | |
 | 1915 - 1338 sider
...reason leading to the making of it [2] The rule is thoroughly settled that: "The granting or denying a new trial on the ground that the evidence is insufficient...its action is conclusive upon this court, unless it api>ears that there has been an abuse of such discretion." Domico v. Casussa, 101 Cal. 413, 35 Рас.... | |
 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1915 - 984 sider
...reversed unless it appears that the order itself was an abuse of discretion. The granting or denying of a new trial on the ground that the evidence is insufficient...there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, rests BO fully in the discretion of the trial court that its action is conclusive upon the appellate court,... | |
 | 1915 - 1340 sider
...the discretion of the trial court that its action is conclusive upon this court, unless it ap])ears that there has been an abuse of such discretion." Domico v. Casassa, 101 Cal. 413, 35 Pnc. 1024 : Warner v. Thomas, etc., Works, 105 Cal. 411, 88 Рас. 960 ; Eidinger v.... | |
 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1917 - 940 sider
...well-established rule that "the granting or denying a new trial on the ground that the evidence is insufficient ti justify the verdict, where there is a substantial...unless it appears that there has been an abuse of discretion." (Domico v. Casnssi, 101 Cal. 413, [35 Pac. 1024] ; Warner v. Thomas etc. Works, 105 Cal.... | |
 | 1918 - 1214 sider
...Рас, 1024, the italicizing being ours: "The granting or denying a new trial on the i ground thnt the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict,...the discretion of the trial court that its action is conelusive upon, this court, unless it appears that there hag been an abuse of such discretion ; and... | |
 | Montana. Supreme Court - 1918 - 770 sider
...judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial. Counsel challenges the integrity of the judgment on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict, and that the court therefore erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. Among others he makes... | |
 | 1919 - 1116 sider
...Iiarty holding the burden of proof can be based, «uch verdict should be set aside upon a motion for a new trial on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict 2. REPLEVIN <S=»134— ACTION ON BOND— EVIDENCE. In an action against the sureties upon a bond,... | |
| |
rests so fully in the discretion of the trial court, that its action is conclusive upon this court, unless it appears that there has been an abuse of discretion. 
