...situated or conditioned with reference to the regulation and its practical consequences (text 267). " Legislation which, in carrying out a public purpose,...affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not violative of the constitutional guaranty of equal protection of the law", Barber y. Connoly, 113 US...

...the States for classification upon any reasonable basis" (188 US 733). Class legislation by a State " if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated " is not prohibited by the fourteenth amendment. Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington* (243 US 219, 239). In Hicklin...

...States for classification upon any reasonable basis " (188 US 733). Class legislation by a State " if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated " is not prohibited by the fourteenth amendment. Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington (243 US 219, 239). In Hicklin...

...supra.) In Barbier v. Connolly, (113 US 27), it is said, at page 32: 'Class legislation, discrimination against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but...similarly situated, is not within the amendment.' Section 71 of the Public Welfare Law is only a part, of the general plan set up therein. Sections 59...

...supra.) In Barbier v. Connolly, (113 US 27), it is said, at page 32: "Class legislation, discrimination against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but...similarly situated, is not within the amendment." Lastly, there is no merit to the claim that section 71 is rendered invalid bv the constitutional provision...

..."Class legislation, discrin tion against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation wl in carrying out a public purpose is limited in its application, if within sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is within the amendment."...

...the opinion of this <>ourt in Bnrtirr v. Co-nnollji (113 US 27. 32), of the equality clause, said. 'Class legislation, discriminating against some and...similarly situated, is not within the amendment.' In Haw* v. Missouri (1"0 US fì8), the court speaking through the same justice said the fourteenth...

...Rep. 359. In the last-mentioned case, where protection of the 14th Amendment was invoked, it is said: "Class legislation, discriminating against some and...similarly situated, is not within the Amendment." We said in Baltimore v. Wollman, 123 Md. 310, 91 Atl. 339: "The necessity and reasonableness of an...

...923, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 357, the Supreme Court, Mr. Justice Field writing, said: "Class legisla-, tion, discriminating against some and favoring others, is...similarly situated, is not within the amendment." The authorities we have cited and commented on seem to us to be con-. elusive of the questions under...

...complaint, if they operate alike upon all persons and property under the same circumstances and conditions. Class legislation, discriminating against some and...favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation which is carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operation...