 It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations with any person whomsoever, whether the refusal rests upon reason, or is the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice.  The Central Law Journal - Side 51899Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Hayes Robbins - 1922 - 222 sider
...Minnesota case it was held by the court that: "It is a part of every man's civil rights that he is left at liberty to refuse business relations with...result of whim, caprice, prejudice or malice. With his reasons, neither the public nor third persons have any legal concern." The whole argument is part... | |
 | United States. Federal Trade Commission, United States - 1922 - 212 sider
...selection of seller and buyer was wholly his own concern. 'It is a part of a man's civil rights that he be at liberty to refuse business relations with any person...whomsoever, whether the refusal rests upon reason, or be the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice.' Cooley on Torts, page 278. See, also, our own... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1922 - 760 sider
...this man, upon the theory that it is a part of every man's civil rights, as Judge Cooley says : "that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice or malice. With his reasons neither the public nor third persons have any legal concern ' ' Cooley, Torts, 3 Ed., 587.... | |
 | Herman Oliphant - 1923 - 1114 sider
...selection of seller and buyer was wholly his own concern. "It is a part of a man's civil rights that he be at liberty to refuse business relations with any person...the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice." Coolev on Torts, p. 278. See, also, our own opinion in Greater New York 'Film Co. v. Biograph Co.,... | |
 | 1923 - 1634 sider
...every man's civil rights that he be at liberty to refuse business relations with any other person, whether the refusal rests upon reason or is the result of whim, caprice, or malice; and with his reasons neither the public nor third persons have any legal concern ; and that,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1925 - 686 sider
...Cooley in his Treatise on Torts. Miss FLINT (reading) : It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. With his reasons neither the public not third persons have any legal concern. It is also his right to have... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. District of Columbia - 1925 - 696 sider
...Cooley in his Treatise on Torts. Miss FLINT (reading) : It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. With his reasons neither the public not third persons have any legal concern. It is also his right to have... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1925 - 676 sider
...Cooley in his Treatise on Torts. Miss FLINT (reading) : It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...with any person whomsoever, whether the refusal rests iipoh reason, or is the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. With his reasons neither the... | |
 | 1916 - 458 sider
...employe a broad field of action. As said by Judge Cooley: 'It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice or malice. With his reasons neither the public nor third persons have any legal concern.' "The interference with the... | |
 | Young Berryman Smith, Noel Thomas Dowling - 1926 - 1310 sider
...Cooley, in his treatise on Torts, p. 278, well says : "It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. With his reasons neither the public nor third persons have any legal concern. It is also his right to have... | |
| |
