...affairs of the company. In Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, 139, indispensable parties are described as "persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." See, also, Barney v. Consolidated Water Co. i'. City of San Diego Baltimore City, 6 Wall. 281, 284;...

...necessary parties. Parties.— lndispensable parties are those who have such an interest in the controversy that a final decree cannot be made without either...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience, p. 139. Cited and relied upon in Christian v. Atlantic, etc., RR, 133 U. S. 241, 33 L. 592, 10 S. Ct....

...as parties to it. Of this latter class the court said, in Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, "they are persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...nature that a final decree cannot be made without affecting that interest or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final disposition may...

...justice between them; (3) indispensable parties, who not only have an interest in the subject-matter of the controversy, but an interest of such a nature...final decree cannot be made without either affecting their interests or leaving the controversy In such a condition that its filial determination may be...

...without affecting other persons not before the court, the latter are not indispensable parties. (3) Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...inconsistent with equity and good conscience. The* statute on which this case is predicated has been construed by the supreme court of Illinois in Low...

...latter without affecting the interests of the former; and parties with an interest in the controversy " of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made...the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." 7 Of these the first two...

...without affecting other persons not before the court, the latter are not indispensable parties. (3) Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." Castle v. Madison, 113 Wis. 346. Many cases might be cited announcing the same rulea in general terms....

...without affecting other persons not before the court, the latter are not indispensable parties. 3. Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. The court in respect to the...

...justice between them; (3) indispensable parties, who not only have an interest in the subject-matter of the controversy, but an interest of such a nature...final decree cannot be made without either affecting their interests or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be...

...without affecting other persons not before the court, the latter are not indispensable parties. 3. Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience.i *A bill to rescind a contract affords an example of [-*-JXA this kind. For, if only a...