...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "not only as to every matter which was offered and...received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but aa to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose." • * * The judgment...

...absent fraud or some other factor invalidating the judgment. Commissioner v. Sunnen, supra at 597. But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different cause or demand, the estoppel principle applies much more narrowly. Thus, under the doctrine of collateral...

...SD 629, 62 NW 953, this court said : A judgment "is final as to the claim or demand in controversy, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim, but as to every other admissible matter which might have been offered for that jnirpose. But, where...

...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound 'not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose.' Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352 [24 L.Ed. 195]." Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen,...

...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352. The judgment puts an end to the cause of action, which cannot...

...controversy, concluding parties not only as to every matter offered to sustain or defeat the claim, but also as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. See, eg , Nevada v. United States, US _ (No 81-2245, Slip Opinion, at pp. 17-18, June 24, T983) . The...

...if rendered upon the merits, constitutes an absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. 1? Three elements must be present before a claim will be barred by a judgment in a prior action. The...

...Kinney, Law of Irrigation and Water Rights § 1535, p. 2764 (2d ed. 1912). Opinion of the Court 463 US concluding parties and those in privity with them,...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352 (1877). The final "judgment puts an end to the cause of action,...

...cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound "TVQ\, crc&s as \x> every matter which was offered and received to sustain...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." * The judgment puts an end to the cause of action, which cannot again be brought into litigation between...

...on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim and as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Commissioner...