Mere austerity of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty... Commentaries on American Law - Side 116av James Kent - 1848Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - 1901 - 836 sider
...Graham, 9 ND 88. 81 NW Rep. 44. Mere rudeness of language, petulance of manner, austerity of temper, or even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not constitute legal cruelty. Dunn v. Dunn, 42 NW Rep. 280; Pcavey v. Peavey, 41 NW Rep. 67; Glcason v.... | |
| Casper Hendrik Van Zyl - 1902 - 1004 sider
...... hence austerity of temper, petn" lance of manner, rudeness of language, want of civil attentions, even " occasional sallies of passion if they do not threaten bodily harm, do " not amount to legal cruelty." So also in the Divorce Court in London it was held1 that neglect, coldness, and insults... | |
| Frederick Pollock, Robert Campbell, Oliver Augustus Saunders, Arthur Beresford Cane, Joseph Gerald Pease, William Bowstead - 1907 - 868 sider
...of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty; they are high moral offences in the marriage state, undoubtedly; not innocent, surely,... | |
| William John Dixon - 1908 - 590 sider
...of temper, petulance of manner, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty: they are high moral offences in the marriage state undoubtedly — not (u) See Adultery,... | |
| Vermont. Supreme Court - 1909 - 630 sider
...Evans, 1 Hog. Con. 35, that "mere austerity of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty." The court then went on to say that these things may cause discomfort, mental anguish... | |
| 1909 - 1176 sider
...of temper, petulance of manner, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, If they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty ; they are high moral offenses In the marriage state undoubtedly, not innocent surely... | |
| David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1913 - 752 sider
...of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty; they are high moral offenses in the marriage state undoubtedly, not innocent surely... | |
| Hiram Morris Rogers - 1914 - 558 sider
...that the duties of the married life can be discharged. Mere austerity of temper, petulance of manner, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention, even...sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, cannot amount to legal cruelty; and that which merely wounds the mental feelings, is in few cases,... | |
| Thomas Johnson Michie - 1914 - 736 sider
...of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention, and accommodation, even occasional sallies of passion, if they do not threaten bodily harm, do not amount to legal cruelty. Moyer r. Moyer, 11 Ala. 620, 623. "An act even strictly of legal cruelty, might be committed... | |
| Caroline Wells Healey Dall - 1914 - 588 sider
...parties." By cruelty is meant "reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt." Mere austerity of temper, petulance of manners, rudeness of language, a want of civil attention, even occasional sallies of passion, do not amount to that cruelty which the law can relieve. The wife must disarm her husband by the weapons... | |
| |