 But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful...  The American and English Encyclopedia of Law - Side 430redigert av - 1891Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1070 sider
...the proximate, not to the remote, cause. It ia laid down in many cases and by leading textwritert, that in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong ia the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural. and probable sequence... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1894 - 704 sider
...circumstances of the case. To warrant a jury in finding that negligence is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v.... | |
 | William Francis Bailey - 1894 - 674 sider
...wrong and injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the... | |
 | Francis Marion Burdick - 1895 - 628 sider
...and the injury ? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. These circumstances, in a... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1895 - 1072 sider
...and the injury ? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural aud probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1895 - 776 sider
...some new and independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? * * It is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence... | |
 | 1897 - 866 sider
...Atkinson r. Transportation Co., 60 Wis., 141, 150-155, 18 NW, 7(i4. It was there held " that generally, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence... | |
 | Edwin Ames Jaggard - 1895 - 700 sider
...and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is a proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence... | |
 | 1897 - 830 sider
...rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that in order to warrant a finding that the negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence... | |
 | 1895 - 1228 sider
...of the several cases. In Scheffer v. Railway Co., 105 US 249, it is said: "But it is generally held that in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an Injury, it must appear that the injury was the... | |
| |
