 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  Railway Problems - Side 713redigert av - 1913 - 830 siderUten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | William Dameron Guthrie - 1898 - 304 sider
...Supreme Court had to declare, and through Chief Justice Waite himself, that " This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." Then, in the Minnesota Railroad Commission cases,2 the Court set aside the state law on the ground... | |
 | 1899 - 1242 sider
...391, 1191, the supreme court of the United States, speaking by Chief Justice Waite, declared that: "Under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...reward. Neither can it do that which In law amounts to the taking of private property for public use without Just compensation, or without due process of... | |
 | Edward Webster Bemis - 1899 - 722 sider
...its action amounts to a regulation of interstate or foreign commerce, yet it must be remembered that "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...corporation to carry persons or property without reward." Again, " If the company is deprived of the power of charging reasonable rates for the use of its property,... | |
 | 1899 - 818 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | 1899 - 818 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | George Park Fisher, George Burton Adams, Henry Walcott Farnam, Arthur Twining Hadley, John Christopher Schwab, William Fremont Blackman, Edward Gaylord Bourne, Irving Fisher, Henry Crosby Emery, Wilbur Lucius Cross - 1900 - 498 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the...without just compensation, or without due process of law.5 1 CM & St. P. Ry. Co. v, Minn., 134 US, 418. 5 Munn v. 111., 94 US, 113, 134. 3 Peik v. C. &... | |
 | George Park Fisher, George Burton Adams, Henry Walcott Farnam, Arthur Twining Hadley, John Christopher Schwab, William Fremont Blackman, Edward Gaylord Bourne, Irving Fisher, Henry Crosby Emery, Wilbur Lucius Cross - 1900 - 512 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the...without just compensation, or without due process of law.5 1 CM & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Minn., 134 US, 418. ' Munn v. 111., 94 US, 113, 134. • Peik v. C.... | |
 | Henry Brannon - 1901 - 596 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights the state can not require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1902 - 1264 sider
...inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the...without just compensation or without due process of In Wabash, St. L. d PR Co. v. Illinois [87]nothing was said affecting *the question of the extent of... | |
| |
