 | Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals - 1919 - 776 sider
...information. "Sixth. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. "Seventh. That the act or omission charged as the offense,... | |
 | Canal Zone. Supreme Court - 1909 - 524 sider
...reads as follows: "That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended." Had the Government on the trial offered a counterfeit... | |
 | South Dakota - 1911 - 652 sider
...can the required object be better attained than by stating the acts constituting the alleged offense "In ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended." State ex rel. Kotillinic v. Swenson, 18 SD, 202, 99... | |
 | 1911 - 1278 sider
...omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise Iangunge without repetition and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended." State v. Douglas, 26 Nev. 203, 05 Рас. 803 (99 Аш.... | |
 | South Dakota - 1911 - 648 sider
...object be better ittained than by stating the acts constituting the alleged offense "in ordinary >"d concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable » person of common understanding to know what is intended." State ex rel. Kotlllinic v. Swenson, 18... | |
 | Nevada - 1912 - 778 sider
...indictment. Fifth — That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Seventh — That the act or omission charged as the... | |
 | 1912 - 1172 sider
...indictment. (6) That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth iu ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and In such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. (7) That the act or omission charged as the offense,... | |
 | 1912 - 1172 sider
...Indictment. (6) That the act or omission charged л s the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth In ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and In such a manner as to enable n person of common understanding to know what is intended. (7) That the act or omission charged as... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1913 - 718 sider
...therefrom: * * * (6) That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language without repetition and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. (7) That the act or omission charged as the offense... | |
 | 1914 - 1242 sider
...information. Sixth: That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth In ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Seventh : That the act or omission charged as the offense,... | |
| |
... 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; 7. 
