...implication necessarily excludes all inchoate interests, possibilities, and expectancies, and 'what is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed.' United States v. Babbit, 1 Black, 65; Gelpcke v. Dubuque, 1 Wall. 220; Stradling v. Morgan Plowd. 199;...

...other purposes connected with the emergency as may be needful or desirable." It is elementary that what is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. County of Wilson v. National Bank, 103 US 770-778, 26 L. Ed. 488 ; City of Little Rock v. US, 103 Fed....

...intention of the legislature, in all particulars, should appear by express words.80 Whatever is necessarily implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed,1 unless repelled by positive language in the act or by its general scope."...

...cities have authority to subscribe for railroad stock and to issue their bonds in payment of it. "What Is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed," and cites the case of the United States v. Babbitt.10 In that case, decided December term. 1861, the...

...goods, chattels, and personal estate of the lunatic. The rule is that whatever is necessarily or plainly implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed ; and the grant of a specific power or the imposition of a definite duty confers...

...accomplish the purposes of the grant." Said the court in Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, 1 Wall. 220: "What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." In City of Evansville v. State, 118 Ind. 426, 21 NE Rep. 267, the court states It as well settled that...

...the rules laying it down that the intention may be gleaned from other acts in pan materia, and that that which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed, serve only to take cognizance of the disclosed intention of the lawgiver. And legislative enactments...

...the will of the legislature by the logical process of inference. ' It is a rule of construction that that which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed.' And as a statute must always be construed with reference to the pre-existing law, it will often happen...

...In construing a statute the rule generally to be observed is that whatever is necessarily or plainly implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed, but a statute should not be extended beyond the fair and reasonable meaning...

...accomplish the purposes of the grant." Said the court in Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, 1 Wall. 220: "What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." In City of Evansville v. State, 118 Ind. 426, 21 NE Rep. 267, the court states it as well settled that...