...may rightfully demand compensation? AMERICAN NEGLIGENCE CASES. a continuous operation? Did the fact constitute a continuous succession of events so linked...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held, that in order to...

...the movement,— or as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. 2 \V. Bl. 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...wrongful act and the Injury,— a continuous operation?" We think it must be held that the negligence of the defendant's servants was the proximate cause of...

...of the movement, or as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. 2 W. Bl. 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that in order to...

...as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. Rcott \. Khcpherd, 2 W. Bl. 892. The question always is, Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that in order to...

...properly left to the jury. Quoting Mr. Justice Strong in a case in the supreme court,4 Judge Wales said: " The question always is : Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury ? " 1 City Electric St Ry. Ca v. Con- railway company in allowing trolley ery, 61 Ark. 381, 33 a "W....

...the movement, or as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market place. 2 Bl. l{ep. 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

...the movement, or as in the oft cited case of the squib thrown in the market-place. 2 Bli Rep. 892. The question always is, Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" If this were an action against one who negligently set the fire in the tower, and thus caused the injurj:...

...395. 399). In our search for the proximate cause in a given set of facts, the questions should be: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" (Milwaukee and St. Paul etc, versus Timothy Kellogg, supra, at page 259). Or, as framed by Mr. Justice...

...remote." In Milwaukee, etc., Railway Co. v. .Kellogg (94 US 469), the court, per STRONG, J., say : " The question always is, Was there an unbroken connection...wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation ? * * * The inquiry must, therefore, always be whether there was any intermediate cause disconnected...

...being the proximate cause of the movement. The question always is, Was there an unbroken connection ? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to form a natural whole, or was there some new and independent cause intervening between the primary cause...