... that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party... The Supreme Court Reporter - Side 4401885Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1206 sider
...that, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or 61 1876. OCT. TERM, may be in every case a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed. Oiblin v. McMullen, LR, 2 PC Apps.. 335; Improvement Co. v. Mvrmon, 14... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 1068 sider
...refusing to charge the jury that the plaintiff, upon the evidence, was not entitled to recover. ID every case before the evidence is left to the jury...jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the parties producing it, upon whom the onut of proof Is imposed. Pleaianti v. Fant, 89 US 22 Wall. 120,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1901 - 1148 sider
...reasonable rule, to wit: that, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be in every case a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed. Giblin v. McMullen, LR, 2 1'. C. Apps., 335 ; Improvement Co. v. Munson,... | |
| David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1901 - 728 sider
...reasonable rule ; to wit, that, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be in every case a preliminary question for the Judge, not whether...verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed." In Randall vs. Salt. & Ohio RR, 109 US, 482, Justice Gray, delivering... | |
| 1898 - 1242 sider
...leave it to the jury, but recent decisions of high authority have established a more reasonable rule, that in every case, before the evidence is left to...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed." Improvement Co. v. Mimson, 14 Wall. 443. The supreme court In 10 Wall, held: "According to the settled... | |
| 1887 - 958 sider
...more reasonable rule that, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be, in every case, a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed." Commissioners Marion Co. v. Clark. 94 US 278-284. It is undoubtedly true... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 870 sider
...him upon that issue. As was said by Mr. Justice Clifford in Improvement Co. v. Munson, 14 Wall. 448 : "In every case, before the evidence is left to the...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed ;" and in Pleasant v. Faut, 21 Wall. 116, the mlewasstated by Mr. Justice Miller as follows : "If the... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1992 - 1404 sider
...preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict -- 'whether there: IB (evidence) upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for tin- party producing it, upon which Lhe onus of proof Is impDsed. Andersen, ioe s.ct. at 2512. In accordance... | |
| |