 But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful...  The American and English Encyclopedia of Law - Side 430redigert av - 1891Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1913 - 1390 sider
...of was the proximate cause of the injury, and, satisfying yourself in this respect, you must believe that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence as alleged in plaintiff's complaint, and that the injury, if any, ought to have been foreseen in the... | |
 | 1902 - 1284 sider
..."In order to warrant a finding that negligence * * * is the proximate cause of an injury, It should appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act. and that It ought to have been foreseen,— not necessarily the precise, actual injury,... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1928 - 1120 sider
...in Milwaukee, etc. Railway Co. v. Kettogg, 94 US 469, at page 475 said : But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. It is well known that time... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1916 - 700 sider
...regard to the wires was the proximate cause of the injury. In order to warrant a finding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances, but it is not... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - 694 sider
...instruments. (Page 62.) 8. SAME — PROXIMATE CAUSE. — To warrant a finding that an act of negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act, and that it ought reasonably to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1909 - 668 sider
...incompetent and prejudicial. "To recover damages on account of the unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances. 69 Ark. 405.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1911 - 700 sider
...fundamental rule of law that, to recover damages on account of the unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." In the... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - 760 sider
...fundamental rule of law that, to recover damages on account of unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. St. Louis,... | |
 | 1888 - 912 sider
...and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. These circumstances, in a... | |
| |
